Evaluator One: Assistant Vice
Chancellor Of Student Affairs/Adjunct Business Faculty, Ivy Tech Community
College – Northeast, Fort Wayne, Indiana
Qualifications: Oversight
of Academic Advising, Student Success Strategies and Retention initiatives for
the regional campuses – Teaching, business, accounting and introduction to
college success courses
Feedback:
Feedback:
I liked
that under assignments the expectations were identified for students
I also liked all the elements that were included within the syllabus
What I think should be improved:
I also liked all the elements that were included within the syllabus
What I think should be improved:
·
I would list the purpose of
the class first and move the meeting dates and locations closer to the
schedule/calendar for clarity and to help with structure as you are going over
the syllabus with the students on the first day.
·
Also, for the calendar I
believe it is helpful to students to have specific dates listed--again for
clarity and planning.
·
Under materials needed,
fitness attire was listed, but there wasn't any reference to the use of the
fitness attire in requirements or assignments.
·
I think the grading
criteria should be more defined. How can a student receive a certificate but
not be required to attend each day and or complete any type of assessment to
ensure they have mastered the material? I
just think there could be more clarity around expectations to receive the
certificate of completion.
·
Lastly, I would suggest adding
listings of relevant support services such as tutoring, library, disability
support, trio etc. Statements regarding plagiarism and other pertinent
statements specific to the institution should also be included such as
environments free from harassment etc.
I found the feedback that was provided by evaluator one to be a
bit of a mixed bag. Because so much of
her role is focused on retention strategies and student outcomes I think she
focused more on content and actual design in some areas that I really hadn’t expected
her to. This is good on some levels
because the overall goal of any course should be to ensure that the information
you are trying to present to the learner is going to come across in a clear and
easy to understand way.
The first point that was made with regard to putting the purpose
of the course is also helpful. I think I took for granted that a person would
know why they were taking a basic introduction to exercise, fitness, and
nutrition course without needing to state it explicitly however from the
standpoint of providing structure and easy of information processing on the
first day of class this comment is valuable.
I think the same can be said for adding specific dates for the
calendar. I left them out with the
thought that it would be easy to use this same syllabus at different times of
the year so it would be best from that position to not put specific dates. Again putting the needs of the student first
I could see how it might be a good retention step so that students could plan
ahead for their work and other obligations if I gave them specific dates for
what would be covered.
The comment about the fitness attire was a bit confusing to me
because again I am working on a course that is designed to focus on working out
so I don’t know if I see the need to add a statement about when the student
will need workout clothes but this is again another personal preference situation
I think. I don’t see that it adds much
value to say in the schedule what clothes to wear when I the beginning of the
document I state that indoor workout attire is required in the materials needed
section.
Grading criteria was an area I wasn’t sure about. I debated for awhile about the need to
outline grading criteria. My thought was
to make this a very flexible course that students were taking for their own
personal interests. This would not be
tied to grades or a particular course of study it was strictly meant to be a
personal enrichment exercise. Because of
this I left out areas for specific evaluation and even made attendance to all
sessions optional. Students can ideally
take whichever parts they feel will add the most value to them and discard what
is not of interest. I added the
certification piece as a draw for people who might be interested in more
advanced practice and needed some evidence of basic knowledge as is sometimes
required for health and wellness programs.
I like the suggestion of additional support services however it
comes across very generic to me on some levels.
I think the point there was to show that there are options for
additional support services if need like tutoring and study skills management
however is that something that would be necessary for a personal enrichment course? I don’t think so but it could also be that It
is there as standard verbiage for all courses.
Same goes for the statements about policy. Overall there were some good points in this
review but I think some of the finer points might have been lost in the
evaluation. This is still a valuable set
of suggestions
Evaluator Two: Registrar, Adjunct
Business Faculty, Ivy Tech Community College – Northeast, Fort Wayne, Indiana
Qualifications: Campus
Records Retention – Teaching, business, accounting and introduction to college
success courses
Feedback:
Under
"Objectives" -- be sure that the points are grammatically parallel to
the "At the conclusion of this course, students will..."
heading. For instance, "At the conclusion of this course, students
will....'develop a safe and effective workout routine' " OR "BE ABLE
TO develop a safe and effective workout routine."
*Is attendance optional? Is this a for-credit course? How will the students' final grades be calculated?
What I liked:
Dividing the schedule into hour increments will keep the instructor accountable to a timeline, but will also help students know what is going on when.
*Is attendance optional? Is this a for-credit course? How will the students' final grades be calculated?
What I liked:
Dividing the schedule into hour increments will keep the instructor accountable to a timeline, but will also help students know what is going on when.
This review seemed more focused on
the grammar and style elements of the syllabus than on the content. As with the first evaluator I think the focus
on attendance is not necessary because ultimately the student is coming at his
or her own leisure and doesn’t need to attend all the sessions to get the most
value out of the program. There is also
a consistent them of interest in having a grading scale or some way to identify
progress within the program. Maybe a
daily check off or peer evaluation form can be provided to help address the
need.
I also liked the way the schedule
was broken down and the interest in holding the instructor and the students
accountable to what is being presented.
It is interesting that both reviewers were consistent about making sure
the student was well informed about the class meeting times and dates. This maybe a topic for more discussion.
I have mixed feelings about these
two reviews. I think that there are some valuable comments and themes in the
feedback but ultimately they seem to have missed the point of the assignment
and focused on things that really don’t seem that important to me. I am cautious about this though because
having never taught myself I can’t be sure if some of the concerns are valid or
just nitpicky extras that have no real bearing on the success of the
program. Regardless I appreciate the
assignment and the feedback that was given by my reviewers.
Evaluations and evaluators are subjective in nature. Take the good and the bad and in the end, use the comments as a guide, but do what you think is best. You know what your intent is, maybe the feedback will help you make the intent in those categories clearer.
ReplyDeleteI thought the evaluators had a couple good points. I had an evaluator suggest adding in about plagiarism, etc. , but I think it didn't apply to my own design at the time! I think you have an awesome program and thought the evaluators had small things to comment on!
ReplyDeleteMike